The overall stupidity of people, although expected, shocks me still.
In the UK you can make a will. Normally you make it with a solicitor although you can make it on your own, as long as a witness (or, maybe two) sign it.
The will determines who/what you wish to leave all your assets to when you die.
A married couple will, normally, elect to leave their assets to their spouse. They might also leave something to their children. A lone parent may choose to leave their assets, equally divided, to their children.
Or, of course, they may not.
Some people choose to leave their assets to a charity. Or to someone who isn’t a relative. Or to only one of their children.
In other words, British people can choose who to leave their assets to – there are no rules but the will must be legally binding.
People who think that they SHOULD have been included in the will can, of course, contest it in court. But it has to be proved that the person making the will made a mistake or was unduly coerced by a beneficiary. This is only worth it when there is a lot of money at stake. Most ordinary wills are not contested.
For example, I doubt very much if my mother has included me in her will. And I very much doubt that, even if it were worth millions, I would be able to successfully contest it since we haven’t had any contact for over 25 years. I could hardly claim that I had a right to a share, could I?
Of course, some Christian principle may encourage her to leave me something. Or, from what I read, if she were Muslim, she would be expected to leave a share to me and exclude my sister. It wouldn’t seem fair but, then, wills aren’t meant to be “fair”. They are meant to express the wishes of the deceased.
So, I read today, in the DailyHate Mail, of a very rich guy who will not be leaving anything to his son!
Now, whilst not being a fan of that newspaper, it is seen as being an OK thing to do since he is saying that his son has to work for his money (and that’s OK according to the right-wing press).
And, yet, in the same paper, yesterday, was a story about how solicitors have been issued guidelines to help them when they are writing wills for Muslims.
This is because, according to their religion, there are “rules” that are meant to apply when someone dies. Of course, without a will, British law would apply. These guidelines are to help solicitors help their Muslim clients to draw up a will that is within British law but that follow the rules of their religion.
Unfortunately, these rules seem to be known as Sharia Law. And so, the headline leads people to believe that “Sharia Law” is being built into British law.
Which is just plain wrong and totally misleading.
And makes the people “shouting” about how terrible it is that “Sharia Law is being enshrined into British Law” seem really stupid.
And, to be honest, THAT really annoys me.
Very interesting.
An Italian friend who live in the UK posted about it on FB claiming that Sharia law was being built into British law! I didn’t have the time to read his post nor the article he was referring to but the overall tone made me suspicious.
In the twitter era, people quickly read the headlines without reading articles. It is really stupid and it annoys me as well.
It’s good to know I’m not alone. A friend of mine, also in the UK, posted a similar thing to which I commented, of course, pointing out the facts. He then proceeded to offer a straw man argument saying that anyone who had left the country should abide by the laws of their new country and not make comments about the UK.
So, I won that argument