A no-painting Saturday

There was no painting because, until Saturday evening, there was no F, being as he was in Germany.

I went to pick him up from the airport, with the dogs. Piero was sick on the way back. It was unexpected because, after the first couple of times, he was fine going to and from Carrara. Ah well, poor thing, I shall have to remember that he’s still a little bit dodgy when it comes to car travel.

However, they were very pleased to see him, as was I.

And, although nothing particular got done over the weekend, I quite enjoyed it and felt quite happy this morning.

Work soon changed that, even if I was busy this morning.

This weekend, apparently, will be the lounge.

Expat? Immigrant?

There was a tweet, recently, relating to an old Guardian piece about the fact that an Indian guys didn’t feel he could be considered an expat.

Of course, it depends on your audience.

If, as an immigrant to Italy, I wrote a piece in an Italian newspaper, I could hardly call myself an expat since a) I am NOT Italian and b) I have not moved out of Italy.

For me it’s a matter of simplicity. Here, I am an immigrant – unless and except when I am talking to other English/American/Canadians here. When I talk to them I am an expat. They are expats too.

However, when I’m with Italians, as, in fact, I have done in the past, I point out that I, too, am an immigrant.

This is usually when they are complaining about the numbers of immigrants here.

It’s interesting that when I point out that I am also an immigrant, they usually respond with something like “Ah, but you’re different.”

What they mean, of course, is that, even if I can’t speak the language (whereas many immigrants can); even if I look different from the majority of Italians (with my blue eyes); even if I act differently (like being more courteous), I am OK because I am white and English and their friend.

As opposed to black or brown, non-European and selling roses or trinkets or working in a kitchen in a restaurant.

But I am mindful that I remain and will always be, an immigrant here.

I am from one of the current EU countries and so I have some “right” to be here – but, I guess, I could also be shipped back to the UK should the authorities deem it necessary.

Here, I have no roots; no “original” place to go to. And so it was true of the Indian writing the Guardian article. So, speaking to a British audience, he was always going to be an immigrant and not an expat.

I don’t think it’s that difficult an idea to grasp?

The IMF – just a bunch of know-nothing bankers

Austerity. You must do this to protect the future and get yourself out of the sh1t.

Oh sh1t. Well, we thought it would be OK but now we see that, in fact, Growth is important. Except for some of the poorer countries. For them it’s still all about austerity.

No, wait a minute. It’s Europe’s fault. They should help the poorer countries.

Austerity. Growth.

Whoops! We were slightly wrong.

_______________________________________________________________________________________

Once upon a time, I thought that people who had the necessary training and qualifications were to be respected. After all, they know what they’re talking about.

Now, maybe because I am much older, I know that this is an utter load of bollocks.

Most people, even those supposedly in charge and who should know what they are doing or saying, don’t.

And, this article sums that all up quite nicely.

To save you the bother of reading it, here are some really ‘choice’ bits:

Christine Lagarde warned that only with greater co-operation and courage could governments hope to prevent a repeat of the financial crisis.

She is the head of the IMF. so she must know what to do, right?

Apparently.

Lagarde said banking regulators had told her that reforms of the financial system were incomplete and in many cases banks were as unsafe as before the collapse of Lehman Brothers in 2008.

So, the regulators of the banks (who are ex-bankers) have told her (the head of the ‘International Bank’) that the banks are unsafe, still, after one of the banks (in the USA) was ‘allowed’ to go bust because the regulators had failed to ensure it was safe.

Europe has come under fire for its failure to end the debt crisis

Because, of course, everyone else has been really brilliant and solved their crisis.

Lagarde said: “We expect action and we expect courageous and co-operative action on the part of our members.”

Ha! So what action do they expect to see?

The IMF has expressed frustration with Europe’s piecemeal response to its debt crisis and warned that a recent respite in borrowing costs for debt-laden countries such as Spain may prove short-lived unless eurozone leaders come up with a comprehensive and credible plan.

Now, to remind ourselves, the IMF said, at the beginning of the crisis, that we should immediately impose austerity and cut borrowing. But, it seems they made a bit of mistake in their calculations:

[The IMF] admitted in its World Economic Outlook report that officials underestimated the effects of austerity measures on economic growth.

The report found that previous estimates that for every £1 of spending cuts the economy shrank by 50p were wrong and the economy shrank by around £1.30 instead.

The IMF was a strong supporter of austerity measures adopted by Western countries, including the UK, in the aftermath of the financial crisis.

As a result:

Most countries that adopted austerity programmes have missed their deficit reduction targets after a sharp slowdown in economic growth hit tax revenues and private sector activity.

So, let’s just get this right – they thought that austerity was good because we would cut debt but they forgot to factor in the fact that, as soon as we have austerity, people stop buying (and borrowing) and so the effect on the economy was a LOT worse than they expected.

I’m sure the head of the IMF will make a full and swift apology and shut her mouth in future.

The IMF has U-turned in recent months and urged government to allow their austerity reforms to be planned over a longer period to lessen the impact on growth.

But I see no apology. Nor do I see everyone ignoring her and the rest of the IMF – which is what they should be doing and should have done.

A three-year-old child would have a better grasp of the situation than they had and, not only do they earn vast sums, tax free (WTF?) but, with their qualifications and experience, they should be able to do much, much better.

Of course, what should be done is to scrap the model we have now – where debt is seen as an asset rather than a liability and the banks should be under control and should be stopped from gambling, which is what they do and which is what led us to this, now.

In fact, now, every time I see something that the IMF head has said, it just makes my blood boil.

It’s outrageous and, should I ever meet her, I just want to tell her to fuck right off.

One out.

I said 4 instead of 3.

To be honest, I couldn’t be sure. Was it 2009 or 2008?

I know I should know but, well, I don’t.

So I said 4.

In fact it’s 3. I had to check this blog to be sure.

Well, it WILL be 3 – at 9.45 this evening. When we shall be at our favourite restaurant for a quiet, lovely dinner. To celebrate. To celebrate 3 (and not 4).

But I was only one out, after all. And it does feel like longer (and shorter).

That’s just the way it is.

A lack of benefits?

A list of the benefits.

But, what if that list doesn’t really contain many (or, indeed, any). What then?

Well, I guess, that kind of changes everything, doesn’t it?

I mean, the whole point of anything is that the benefits must outweigh the disadvantages or things that are decidedly NOT benefits.

And, if they don’t, then, where does that leave you?

Hmmmmm.

Religion, Lies Part 1 (and THAT newspaper.)

The DailyHateMail is at it again.

Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister of the UK, apparently, in a speech that was issued (but not actually made), called the people opposing the right of marriage for gay people, bigots.

Today, the headline in the DM says I apologise for my gay marriage ‘bigot’ slur, says Clegg as he tries to limit fallout caused by remark

Clegg wrote a letter which, apparently, says:

‘Those extracts were neither written or approved by me. They do not represent my views, which is why they were subsequently withdrawn.

‘While I am a committed advocate of equal marriage, I would never refer to people who oppose it in this way. Indeed, I know people myself who do not support equal marriage and, although I disagree with them, clearly I do not think they are bigots. Nor do I think it is acceptable they, or anyone else, are insulted in this way.

‘My views on this issue are no secret, but I respect the fact that some people feel differently to me about marriage, often because of their religious beliefs.

‘I hope this explanation helps clarify what happened yesterday as well as my position, and I hope that the serious error that occurred will not cause lasting offence.’

Well, a couple of things here.

1. Clegg didn’t make the speech. And, in any event, these people don’t actually write their speeches. So, someone (but NOT Clegg) wrote the speech which was issued ahead of the event at which Clegg was going to speak. The to-do that occurred as a result meant that the words were changed (or, perhaps it really WAS a mistake).

2. The letter that Clegg subsequently wrote does not apologise for something that he didn’t say in the first place.

3. The definition of a bigot, namely a person having or revealing an obstinate belief in the superiority of their own opinions and a prejudiced intolerance of the opinions of others, seems to fit quite well. That’s religion for you.

It’s time to move on.

“It will be fixed within 3 days”, he states.

“What? Another 3 days?”, I query with a certain amount of incredulity.

“What do you mean?”, he asks.

“I rang on Friday evening”, I reply, “and they told me that it would be fixed by Monday”.

“One moment”, he says, “I will check our records”.

I wait. I can hear the clicking of keys on keyboard.

“No, I’m sorry but I don’t have any record on the system”.

“But I did ring on Friday evening”.

“It’s not that I don’t believe you, it’s just that there’s nothing on the computer and that means that we can’t do anything until the 26th. If it still doesn’t work on the 26th, call us and we can send an email to the Technical people”.

Well, on the bright side, I now know how it works.

They receive a call to say that it isn’t working and they do nothing for three days. If, in three days, their technical people haven’t fixed the problem, then, and only then, will they contact the technical people.

They are, in fact, a bunch of tossers.

Today I look for someone else to provide me with the Internet as Telecom Italia are a fucking disgrace.

Saving? Where? Oh – you mean NOT spending more than before? Is that saving? Really?

Imagine I spend €300 per month, every month.

Then imagine that the government decide to increase sales tax (VAT/IVA) or something from next month. It will mean that, in future, instead of spending €300 I will have to spend €350.

Then, imagine that the government decide to postpone the tax increase until, let’s say, the end of the year.

So, instead of spending €300, as I do now, I will be spending €300 – the same – until the end of the year.

Let me just count out how much I have ‘saved’. Oh, I see that, in fact I have not saved anything but I will not be spending extra for a little while yet.

Compare this with:

I spend €300 per month every month.

The government CUT taxes from next month. It will mean that, instead of spending €300 per month, I will be spending €250 per month. In this case I will be spending €50 less and, so I can actually ‘save’ that money. It’s a kind of bonus to me and is a real saving since I will, actually, be paying LESS.

People’s ideas of ‘saving’ is incredible. The only way you save anything is to spend LESS than you did before.

V used to try this thing with me some times, a long time ago, and it’s logic was of the very worst kind.

The little scenario went like this:

“Do you know how much I saved with this shirt?”

“Well, as you actually SPENT money, I can’t see how you have SAVED any at all!”

“But it was a bargain”

OK, so I paraphrase a lot – but you get the picture. I know other people who do this – it’s not just him.

But back to recent news.

If a tax increase is not put into effect, nobody has SAVED anything at all. It does mean that, in the future, people will not have to spend as much as they might, but it hasn’t made anything cheaper.

And so, this latest so-called U-turn by the government of the UK to NOT put up the tax on petrol (gas to you, Gail) as had been planned, is being lauded and trashed by all and sundry at the same time. But it seems, to me, that everyone is missing the point or points.

This decision to postpone the tax hike will NOT mean that anyone will SAVE money. They will just not spend as much as they might have done.

And this is no U-turn. The hike is not cancelled – merely postponed.

So here is something that is being done in response to the beating they were getting for daring to increase a tax when the country is all but down the drain (See my post Death Valley – UK High Street). But don’t think, for a moment, that anyone will be saving anything.

And then there was this little piece with a video of the Newsnight “interview”

… and then this stupidness – in the same paper!

To be honest, she deserved everything she got. The answer to “When did you know?” is very simple and involves a time or, at least, a date. From there on, it was always going to be downhill.

But, then, if they can equate ‘saving’ to ‘not having to spend more’ then, I guess, we’re all doomed. Might as well have V go and be Prime Minister! :-(

Just like a film?

Well, I can’t explain it at all. So this isn’t really going to be a post that makes sense.

Sometimes this happens and it happened this morning. Actually, more or less ALL morning so far.

I feel there’s something wrong. It’s almost as if I am watching a film of myself, as if I’m not really experiencing this. Make sense to you? No, probably not.

So there’s this feeling that something is wrong but there is no pointer as to what may be wrong. It’s more like when you walk into a room and something is out of place but you can’t see what is out of place but it makes the room look different and ‘not quite right’.

Or if you walk into a crowded room and everyone immediately stops talking and looks at you.

It’s just a feeling. There’s nothing of any substance that you can put your finger on. Everything appears to be normal but it’s not. I mean to say, it is normal but, behind it all, something is abnormal.

It doesn’t really cause any ‘pain’ but it’s a little uncomfortable. As If I should do something to stave off this impending wrongness by fixing something but since I don’t know what IS wrong, it’s difficult to fix.

This morning I felt like I was going to work after a few weeks off. How strange is that? Worse still, it felt like I hadn’t driven my car for weeks when, in fact, I had driven to the airport to collect F only yesterday!

It made me feel like I shouldn’t be going to work – or, at least, not this work in this place. That goes with a growing feeling that I should really get off my arse and do something about finding something a little more personally rewarding (as well as financially rewarding, I suppose) – but it doesn’t explain how wrong it all felt. How wrong it all feels.

So, there you go. There’s no point to this post other than to tell you how strange I feel.

Restless

Things just happen.

It’s just that sometimes, they need a helping hand. In fact, you’ve got to put yourself in the right position for the happening to happen.

And I’m feeling a little restless.

I feel that I need some more challenge (and it would be nice to earn more money, too!).

So, I’m doing something about it.

Not a lot, you understand, after all this feeling may pass (and I am inherently lazy when it comes to myself), but doing something is better than nothing.

I need to do other things as well, to ‘set things up’. Which I will probably do in the next couple of weeks.

Who knows what will happen – but something might? One must be prepared.

Let’s see :-)